|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| '''''The Second and Third Quartet Matinées. The First Symphony Concert of the Russian Musical Society. The Italian Opera''''' (Второе и третье квартетные утра. Первое симфоническое собрание Русского музыкального общества. Итальянская опера) <ref name="note1"/> ([[TH]] 268 ; [[ČW]] 532) was Tchaikovsky's sixth music-review article for the Moscow journal ''Russian Register'' (Русские ведомости), in which it was published on 7 November 1872 {{OS}}, signed only with the initials "B.L.". | | {{picture|file=Nikolay Kondratyev.jpg|caption='''Nikolay Kondratyev''' (1832-1887)}} |
| | Lawyer and friend of Tchaikovsky (b. 1832; d. 3 October 1887 at [[Aachen]]), born '''''Nikolay Dmitriyevich Kondratyev''''' (Николай Дмитриевич Кондратьев). |
|
| |
|
| This article contains very interesting observations by Tchaikovsky on [[Mendelssohn]]'s musical style and that of [[Brahms]] of whom he is quite critical; the more passionate attitude towards music in [[Saint Petersburg]] compared to [[Moscow]]; the significance of [[Beethoven]]'s '' Eroica'' Symphony; and on [[Liszt]]'s religious music
| | ==Tchaikovsky and Kondratyev== |
| | He was first introduced to Tchaikovsky in 1864 at the estate of Prince Aleksey Golitsyn in [[Trostinets]], but became friendly with the composer in 1870, when Kondratyev brought his wife [[Mariya Kondratyeva|Mariya]] and daughter Nadezhda (b.1865) to [[Moscow]] for the winter. Tchaikovsky was also a frequent visitor to the family's estate at [[Nizy]], near [[Kharkov]], where he worked on his operas ''[[The Oprichnik]]'' (1870–72) and ''[[Vakula the Smith]]'' (1874), his [[Symphony No. 3]] (1875), as well as his ''[[Guide to the Practical Study of Harmony]]'' (1871). |
|
| |
|
| ==History==
| | [[Modest Tchaikovsky]], in his biography of the composer, noted how the latter's great friendship with Kondratyev might at first glance have seemed quite improbable, since Kondratyev was very much a man-about-town who moved in high society circles like a fish in water, whereas Tchaikovsky had distanced himself from that world ever since deciding to devote his life to music. However, Kondratyev's irrepressible cheerfulness and ''joie de vivre'' appealed to the composer enormously. Tchaikovsky's own optimism would gain fresh strength whenever he visited his friend, who was always happy and satisfied. Even in difficult moments he would invariably expect something to turn up, and in this respect the composer's brother [[Modest]] felicitously compared Kondratyev to Stiva Oblonsky in [[Tolstoy]]'s ''Anna Karenina''<ref name="note1"/>. But as Alexander Poznansky has noted, [[Modest]] did not give a complete appraisal of Kondratyev's character: "From the [composer's] letters and diaries, however, emerges a different and far more complex relationship. In general, they draw a rather stormy picture of the relations between the two men, leaving little doubt that Kondratyev was a capricious, selfish, and wilful person and extremely difficult to get on with, especially for so sensitive and delicate a companion as Tchaikovsky. And yet, despite the categorical assertions quite often found in his writings, Tchaikovsky continued to take pleasure in Kondratyev's company" <ref name="note2"/>. |
| Completed by 7/19 November 1872 (date of publication). Reviewing the following events:
| |
| * A chamber music concert of the Russian Musical Society in [[Moscow]] on 22 October/3 November 1872, at which [[Mendelssohn]]'s String Quartet No. 1 in E-flat major, Op. 12, [[Beethoven]]'s Piano Sonata No. 12 in A-flat major, Op. 26, and [[Brahms]]'s String Sextet No. 1 in B-flat major, Op. 18 were performed;
| |
| * The following chamber music concert in this series on 29 October/10 November 1872, featuring Joachim Raff's String Quartet No. 4 in A minor, Op. 137, [[Schumann]]'s Piano Trio No. 1 in D minor, Op. 63, and [[Beethoven]]'s String Quintet in C major, Op. 29;
| |
| * A symphonic concert of the Russian Musical Society on 31 October/12 November 1872, conducted by [[Nikolay Rubinstein]] and featuring [[Beethoven]]'s ''Eroica'' Symphony, the Overture to [[Schumann]]'s opera '' Genoveva'', a chorus from [[Liszt]]'s oratorio ''Christus'', and [[Johan Svendsen]]'s Violin Concerto in A major, Op. 6 (soloist: [[Ferdinand Laub]])
| |
| * A performance of [[Donizetti]]'s '' Linda di Chamounix'' at the [[Moscow]] Bolshoi Theatre on 3/ 15 November 1872, with [[Adelina Patti]] in the title role
| |
|
| |
|
| ==English translation==
| | Kondratyev was in the habit of spending his money without thinking twice, and in the winter of 1881–82 he went with his wife and daughter to Italy, in order to accompany Tchaikovsky, [[Modest]], and the latter's pupil [[Nikolay Konradi]] on their sight-seeing tours of [[Rome]], [[Naples]], [[Sorrento]], [[Pompeii]], and [[Florence]]. Although in the 1880s the Kondratyevs no longer spent their summers at [[Nizy]], since they had moved to [[Saint Petersburg]] for the sake of Nadezhda's education, Tchaikovsky would still visit them frequently whenever he stopped by at the Imperial capital. In the summer of 1886, though, Kondratyev and his family rented a dacha at [[Maydanovo]], near Tchaikovsky's house, greatly to the latter's delight. From Kondratyev's library he was able to borrow several volumes of [[Tolstoy]]'s works that summer, leading to some fascinating diary entries about his favourite writer (see the entry on [[Lev Tolstoy]] for more details). |
| {{Copyright|English text copyright © 2009 Luis Sundkvist}}
| |
|
| |
|
| ===The Second and Third Quartet Matinées===
| | Tchaikovsky had always been very fond of Kondratyev's daughter Nadezhda (whom he had first met as a little girl and called "Dinochka" ever since), and in 1893 he would dedicate one of his last piano pieces to her: '' Valse-bluette'' (No. 11 of the [[Eighteen Pieces, Op. 72]]). Nadezhda wrote some remarkably vivid memoirs about the composer, describing his stays at their estate in [[Nizy]] during the 1870s. She also said the following about her father: |
|
| |
|
| The programme of the Russian Musical Society's second chamber music matineé concert consisted of a string quartet by [[Mendelssohn]] (E minor) <ref name="note2"/>, a piano sonata by [[Beethoven]] (A-flat major), and the first performance in [[Moscow]] of [[Brahms]]'s string sextet (B-flat major).
| | {{quote|My father, N. D. Kondratyev, famous for his friendship with Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, was a very clever and all-round educated person. He passionately loved music, literature, and painting; he read all the journals, spoke many languages, travelled a great deal, and read all the works written by Russian and foreign authors. He was bound by the very closest ties of friendship not only to Pyotr Ilyich, but also to [[Modest|Modest Ilyich]] [...] And as for my father, there was no dearer person and better friend on the whole wide world than Pyotr Ilyich" <ref name="note3"/>. |
|
| |
|
| [[Mendelssohn]]'s string quartet, like all of his works, is distinguished by the extraordinary grace of its form and by its splendid instrumentation, but these, though, are just outward, technical merits which [[Mendelssohn]] possessed to an extent perhaps unsurpassed by any other composer of the German school. As a matter of fact [[Mendelssohn]]'s works show such formal perfection and the fluency of their chord sequences attains such a level of ideal purity that—strange though it may seem!—they can come across as sickly-sweet, as varnished, if I may put it that way. | | Early in 1887, however, Kondratyev became incurably ill with dropsy and underwent terrible agony during the last ten months of his life. Tchaikovsky stayed with him in [[Aachen]] for three of these months and tried to comfort and encourage his friend as best as he could, but in the end it was too much for him to bear and he left for Russia. After Kondratyev's death Tchaikovsky continued visiting his widow [[Mariya Kondratyeva|Mariya]] and daughter Nadezhda in [[Saint Petersburg]]. He also provided assistance to his late friend's servant Sasha Legoshin, whose character he thought very highly of <ref name="note4"/>. He would often invite Legoshin's wife and children to stay with him at [[Maydanovo]], [[Frolovskoye]], and [[Klin]] during the summer months <ref name="note5"/>. |
|
| |
|
| After all, in real life we sometimes meet well-educated, intelligent people whose manner is unfailingly sweet and enchanting, whose conversation flows like treacle—people who never overstep the limits of exquisite propriety, who are always calm, immaculately dressed, well-combed and perfumed. Such people may charm you at your first encounter with them, but just try talking to them every day and you will soon see how quickly you become tired of their imperturbably graceful elegance.
| | ==Tchaikovsky's Works Dedicated to Nikolay Kondratyev== |
| | | * ''Rêverie du soir'' — No. 1 of the [[Six Pieces, Op. 19]] (1873) |
| Among the composers it is this type of musical personality that [[Mendelssohn]] embodies. Having very early on enchanted the whole musical world with his undeniably attractive qualities, and, in particular, with that graceful roundedness of form which his talented nature was able to command immediately (it was at the age of twenty that he wrote his finest work: the music to A Midsummer Night's Dream) <ref name="note3"/>, [[Mendelssohn]] soon became the head of a whole school of imitators, who strove to pick up not just his method of harmonisation and orchestration, but also his bitter-sweet melodiousness and all the peculiarities of his artistic manner.
| |
| | |
| For about twenty years [[Mendelssohn]] was the idol of concert-going audiences in both hemispheres and was also considered the supreme authority in the realm of his art, so that [[Schumann]], for example, whose own talent by far surpassed [[Mendelssohn]]'s in depth and vigour, nevertheless deferred to him in all respects. But since all this Mendelssohnism was essentially no more than a fashion, and fashions are short-lived, it was inevitable that [[Mendelssohn]]'s fame and authority would fade just as quickly as they had flared up in the first place, and that, like any intense movement, they provoked a strong counter-reaction. In Germany nowadays, as well as in our own country's most progressive musical circles, people have swung over to the other extreme, effectively denying [[Mendelssohn]]'s high, if not particularly profound, creative gift, which is beyond all question.
| |
| | |
| However, the incorruptible voice of aesthetic criticism will eventually do justice to [[Mendelssohn]]. For he will always remain a paragon of faultless stylistic purity, and there will also be rightful acknowledgement of his sharply delineated musical individuality, which though it may fade before the splendour of such a genius as [[Beethoven]] nevertheless stands out miles above from the host of innumerable workmanlike musicians of the German school.
| |
| | |
| In the aforementioned string quartet the second movement is particularly charming: an Allegretto full of verve which is delightfully scored and has a melody with a rhythm of great originality. The Finale is extremely interesting because of its splendid polyphonic combinations. Its form is also remarkably original in that, quite unexpectedly, twice during the development of the theme we suddenly hear the charming minor melody from the initial Allegro movement. This strikingly successful deviation from the standard string quartet form produces an enchanting impression.
| |
| | |
| [[Beethoven]]'s somewhat antiquated sonata in A-flat major (with the first-movement variations) was splendidly played by [[Nikolay Rubinstein]] with the energy and enthusiasm that are so characteristic of him. The audience was enraptured by his extraordinarily poetic performance of the work.
| |
| | |
| At this matinée concert we also heard a string sextet by [[Brahms]], one of the leading lights of German instrumental music. There was a time when all of Germany looked to him as a composer who was still young and who it was hoped would lead the art of music there along new, untrodden paths; who seemed endowed with such creative powers that would not only put him on a par with his great predecessors, but even allow him to eclipse them. The stir that accompanied the appearance of [[Brahms]]'s first works in the German musical world (in the early 1850s) was in fact caused by [[Schumann]].
| |
| | |
| It is well known that the greatest artists rarely have the gift of an infallible critical instinct and that, on the contrary, they are often extremely lenient in judging their fellow-artists. We find a striking example of such critical softness of heart in [[Schumann]], who all his life prostrated himself before [[Mendelssohn]], [[Chopin]], [[Berlioz]], and even before such nonentities in the realm of composition as Henselt <ref name="note4"/> and Giller <ref name="note5"/>. Yes, [[Schumann]], who went into genuine raptures over the slightest manifestation of talent in others, but who didn't realise his own worth!
| |
| | |
| Towards the end of his life [[Schumann]], by means of the newspaper he had set up in [[Leipzig]] <ref name="note6"/>, started to proclaim the imminent arrival of the musical Messiah who would illuminate the whole world of music with the rays of his genius and inherit the place left vacant by [[Beethoven]]. When [[Brahms]]'s first sonatas came out, [[Schumann]], with the laconic phrase: "He has appeared!", informed his readers about the advent of the eagerly awaited genius whom he duly proclaimed to be none other than the young [[Brahms]]. Time, however, has shown that this rash step by [[Schumann]] was the mistake of a generous and ingenuous artist who allowed himself to be carried away far too easily.
| |
| | |
| For [[Brahms]] has not justified the hopes that were placed on him by [[Schumann]] and consequently by all of musical Germany. He is one of those mediocre composers of which the German school can boast so many. His style of composition is polished, fluent, and clear, but lacks the slightest gleam of original talent; he is content to just keep on milling the wind with musical ideas that everyone has long since grown tired of, and which he has borrowed mainly from [[Mendelssohn]], though at the same time he has also tried to imitate some of [[Schumann]]'s external mannerisms.
| |
| | |
| [[Brahms]] is not without talent, and that is the reason why he is head and shoulders above so many of his contemporaries, but he does not have any of that individuality which might somehow make him stand out from other modern German composers, not to mention those unrealised hopes about his 'genius'. The string sextet which we are discussing here does not, moreover, belong to his best works.
| |
| | |
| Of the four movements into which it is divided I particularly liked the Andante with its sweeping, vigorous theme and its beautiful development through a set of variations. The last of these variations (on a d–a fifth) left a charming impression on me, thanks mainly to the instrumentation. The Scherzo is also not lacking in verve and brilliance, but the first-movement Allegro and the Finale are no different from what we find in works of this kind by such contemporary German composers as Bargiel <ref name="note7"/>, Raff <ref name="note8"/>, Rheinberger<ref name="note9"/>, Volkmann <ref name="note10"/>, and a whole phalanx of other artists who deserve respect for their splendid technique and earnestness of style, but who lack that spark of inspiration which would infuse their works with life and strength.
| |
| | |
| The third chamber music matinée, which was distinguished by the collaboration of so fine a musician as Mr [[Laub]] <ref name="note11"/>, featured a rather weak string quartet by Raff <ref name="note12"/>, who belongs to the same league of composers as [[Brahms]], the splendid Piano Trio in D minor by [[Schumann]] and a string quintet by [[Beethoven]] which is very rarely performed, and which, it must be said, does not belong to his most significant musical creations. This matinée was the final one in the Russian Musical Society's series of chamber music concerts for the current season.
| |
| | |
| ===The First Symphony Concert of the Russian Musical Society===
| |
| | |
| Many are the bitter moments which people in [[Moscow]] who are earnestly devoted to art in general, and to our national Russian art in particular, have to endure. As far as the level of musical culture of our public is concerned, our venerable capital lags significantly behind not just the major musical centres of Western Europe, but also behind [[Saint Petersburg]], where many of the negative aspects of its musical life are at least compensated for by the secure and stable presence there of a well-endowed Russian Opera Theatre which is not subject to uncertainties and the arbitrariness of individual persons.
| |
| | |
| The public there takes a lively interest in everything that concerns music, and the way that musical events are always in the public eye is clearly reflected in the [[Saint Petersburg]] press which devotes quite a considerable amount of space to music criticism. Even if the reviewers there often quarrel amongst themselves and do so, moreover, with such zeal that their altercations have sometimes even led to court examinations (as in the case Famintsyn v. [[Stasov]]) <ref name="note13"/>; even if in the heat of their polemic fervour they sometimes pronounce, for all Russia to hear, such radical and extreme opinions about music as to leave one quite nonplussed, this very same exaggeratedly passionate attitude to their task as critics does testify to the existence of musical factions in [[Saint Petersburg]] and consequently also to the presence there of struggle, movement, and life. We do not have anything like that here: as in so many other aspects of public life in [[Moscow]], there is in its music, too, a sense of lull, a death-like slumber, an attitude of imperturbable nonchalance towards the interests of art, dejection and stagnation.
| |
| | |
| That is why music-lovers can find such welcome spiritual balsam in the Russian Musical Society's concerts, whose excellent programmes, high performance standards, and the large audiences they invariably attract all testify to the fact that Russian art could flourish in [[Moscow]], too, if there were to emerge from our midst even more people full of energy and wholeheartedly devoted to their vocation like those to whom the Russian Musical Society is indebted for its resplendent and seemingly secure existence.
| |
| | |
| Last Tuesday the Society's first symphonic concert of the season took place. The most important work on the programme was [[Beethoven]]'s Eroica Symphony. In this symphony, the third he wrote, we see how the immense, astounding force of [[Beethoven]]'s creative genius reveals itself fully for the first time, since in his first two symphonies he comes across as no more than a talented follower of his predecessors [[Haydn]] and [[Mozart]].
| |
| | |
| The first movement of this symphony amazed [[Beethoven]]'s contemporaries because of the novelty of its grandiose form and the laconic punch of its main musical ideas from which the composer, by means of splendid polyphonic development and an orchestral technique of unsurpassed perfection, was able to create his colossal work. Indeed, the main theme he used for the first Allegro was a short fanfare of just four bars which undergoes several kaleidoscopic modifications and variations to make up the symphony's most important movement. It is followed by an Andante of a sombre and funereal character in which one can readily hear the universal laments for the downfall of the hero whom [[Beethoven]] mentions in the title of his symphony: ''"Sinfonia Eroica composta per festeggiare il sovvenire di un grand'uomo"''.
| |
| | |
| Attempts of various kinds have been made in Germany, as well as in our country, to explain the fiery Scherzo, so full is it of fantastic episodes, and in this innocent, yet ultimately quite irrational striving to clothe the elusive contours of [[Beethoven]]'s fantasy with real images, some people have gone to such curious extremes as the [[Saint Petersburg]] critic "Rostislav" <ref name="note14"/>, who has suggested that in this Scherzo [[Beethoven]] was seeking to portray a cavalry charge on the enemy infantry lines. But however that may be, it is undeniable that this Scherzo, with its unexpected opening on a VI–V chord from the strings and its joyful fanfares in the middle, produces a most enchanting impression on the listener.
| |
| | |
| The symphony ends with a brilliant, fiery Finale that is full of triumphal jubilation. I was glad to observe that the members of the audience at this Russian Musical Society concert, many of whom, not so long ago, would have been going to concerts just to take a look at everyone else and to show themselves in society, listened to the symphony with great attention and openly demonstrated their approval at the end of each movement.
| |
| | |
| The overture to [[Schumann]]'s opera ''Genoveva'' is one of the most delightful works by this composer of genius. With what compelling truth does he manage to convey here Genoveva's beautiful character and her suffering at having been so cruelly slandered! It would be wonderful if the Russian Musical Society's board of directors were to give us an opportunity to hear several more fragments from this splendid opera which for some reason never seems to be staged anywhere. For example, I can point to the crusaders' chorus in Act I, which even on a concert stage would surely cause a great impression.
| |
| | |
| In the vocal music section of the concert we heard a fragment from [[Liszt]]'s recent oratorio ''Christus'', namely the chorus with these words from the Gospel of St Matthew: "Tu es Petrus, et super hanc petram" followed by "Simon Joannis, diligis me?" For a number of years now [[Liszt]] has been devoting himself almost exclusively to writing sacred music, to which he is drawn by the deeply religious disposition of his beautiful, truly Christian and meek soul. And, indeed, hardly any other composer has succeeded as he has in giving expression to the profoundly moving poetry of Christian love.
| |
| | |
| In his ''Legend of the Holy Elisabeth'' there are such irresistibly touching episodes as, for example, the death of Elisabeth, which are unmatched by anything else of this kind. For in [[Beethoven]]'s masses, which are permeated by that very same spirit of sombre despair in the struggle with life that was embodied above all by [[Byron]] in the first half of our century, we hear the cry of an exhausted soul which searches in vain for a way out of its suffering. The words of the liturgy in these masses merely serve as a pretext for the powerful lyric effusions of sentiment by the purely subjective genius that [[Beethoven]] was. [[Liszt]], on the other hand, who found reconciliation and peace for himself in religion, seeks, in his works of sacred music, to express objectively the poetically moving idea of Christian humility and love. He is as far removed from the classical dryness of [[Bach]]'s, [[Handel]]'s, and even Cherubini's sacred music, as he is also from [[Beethoven]]'s masses, which, as I explained earlier, are effectively no different from his poetically intensive symphonies, except that they happen to be set to religious texts.
| |
| | |
| The aforementioned chorus by [[Liszt]] opens with a powerful recitative for the male voices who declaim the words: "Tu es Petrus" etc. Then, after Christ's questions to the Apostle, the women's choir steps in with the words: "Pasce agnos meos", and there ensues a delightful pastoral dialogue which could have come straight out of the Gospel, and which conveys the bright landscape of Palestine, where the words of brotherly, all-forgiving love were first pronounced. The other fragment from this oratorio by [[Liszt]]—the March of the Three Holy Kings—does not particularly stand out from his other instrumental works, even though we do find in it, as is always the case with [[Liszt]], excellent instrumentation combined with graceful harmonic elements which are far removed from the usual German routine.
| |
| | |
| The soloist in this concert was again Mr [[Laub]], who performed a violin concerto by the young Norwegian composer [[Svendsen]] <ref name="note15"/>—a work which does show flashes of original talent, but which is also marked considerably by the routine of contemporary German symphonic writing. In the vast legion of German symphonists Mr [[Svendsen]] is no more than a rank-and-file soldier, though with the potential to be promoted to officer's rank at some point.
| |
| | |
| Now Mr [[Svendsen]] is a Norwegian by birth, and although in the violin concerto played for us by Mr [[Laub]] we could now and then discern a few allusions to his nationality (Norwegian and Swedish folksongs do have many things in common with our Russian songs!), it is nevertheless the case that Mr [[Svendsen]] is still heavily weighed down by the pressure of German routine, in which he so thoroughly steeped himself during his studies at the [[Leipzig]] Conservatory. There is no need to go into details about [[Laub]]'s magnificent performance, though I must say that this time there was a certain weariness in his playing, which is not at all characteristic of this inspired virtuoso. I had the impression that Mr [[Laub]] wasn't in his best form that evening. However, it is also true that Mr [[Svendsen]]'s difficult and rather complicated work does not belong to those pieces which allow for a dazzling display of virtuosity.
| |
| | |
| As for the playing of the orchestra, there is no doubt that it was splendid, especially if we bear in mind how little time it had for the few rehearsals that could be organised because of the quite limited means of the Russian Musical Society, and also taking into account the difficulties that must inevitably arise when several members of the orchestra are also engaged to play in the opera-house and are overloaded with work there by Signor Merelli. Fortunately, though, the Russian Musical Society has in the person of [[Nikolay Rubinstein]] not just a splendid conductor, but, most importantly, one who is experienced and is able to make up for the lack of time and the unavailability of some players through his untiring and forceful efficiency.
| |
| | |
| ===The Italian Opera===
| |
| | |
| All interest in the Italian Opera Company is now concentrated on the enchanting and inimitable Madame [[Patti]]. After ''La Traviata'' this lovely singer, a pearl among her colleagues, appeared in ''Rigoletto'', ''Don Pasquale'', and finally in one of the best roles of her repertoire: as the heroine in ''Linda di Chamounix''. This latter production was particularly interesting in that alongside Madame [[Patti]] in the title-role it also featured, in the role of Pierotto, our young Russian singer Madame Eybozhenko <ref name="note16"/>, who had such successful débuts in''A Life for the Tsar'' and ''Ruslan and Lyudmila''.
| |
| | |
| I must confess that I was not a little anxious for Madame Eybozhenko because it is not very advantageous for a singer who has not yet made a name for herself to appear on the same stage alongside such a major figure as our, alas, ephemeral guest artist. An all too understandable timidity somewhat paralysed Madame Eybozhenko's energies at first, and she did not sing her first, off-stage aria particularly brilliantly, but nor was there anything bad about her performance. However, our singer managed to pull herself together and little by little her very good vocal means revealed themselves so successfully that in her duet with Madame [[Patti]] in Act II she was justly rewarded with the unanimous and enthusiastic applause of the audience.
| |
| | |
| May this important step in Madame Eybozhenko's career help to encourage her on her way, for this young singer must still carry on striving to overcome her faults if she wishes to become a fully accomplished artist. On another occasion I observed how Madame Eybozhenko wasn't very good at keeping time, how she seemed to suffer from a tendency to speed up her tempi excessively, making it nigh to impossible for poor Mr Shramek <ref name="note17"/>, who by nature is quite sluggish, to keep up with her accelerated singing in Ruslan. This time, however, I noticed that Madame Eybozhenko has begun to pay greater attention to accuracy of rhythm in her performance, and this is an achievement for which we must congratulate our young artist. May she carry on perfecting herself in other respects, too, and this cannot but serve to increase the pleasure which her singing gives the audience and make her success quite indisputable.
| |
| | |
| M. Naudin continues deservedly to enjoy the sympathy of our theatre-goers. In ''Linda di Chamounix'', especially in his duet with Madame [[Patti]], he again showed us the high level of his artistry and the noble gracefulness of his phrasing.
| |
| {{right|''"B. L."''}}
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Notes and References== | | ==Notes and References== |
| <references> | | <references> |
| <ref name="note1">Entitled 'Second and Third Quartet Mornings. First Symphony Concert of the Russian Musical Society. The Italian Opera' in [[TH]], and 'The Second and Third Quartet Matinees—The First Symphonic Assembly of the Russian Musical Society—The Italian Opera' in [[ČW]].</ref> | | <ref name="note1">See {{bib|1900/35|Жизнь Петра Ильича Чайковского ; том 1}} (1997), p. 328–330.</ref> |
| <ref name="note2">The programme notes, however, state that it was [[Mendelssohn]]'s String Quartet in E-flat major, Op. 12, and the description which follows confirms that it must have been this early work rather than the E minor quartet — ''note by Ernst Kuhn''.</ref> | | <ref name="note2">Alexander Poznansky, ''{{bib|1993/186|Tchaikovsky: The Quest for the Inner Man}}'' (1993), p. 143. As also pointed out there, an important circumstance regarding Kondratyev which [[Modest]] did not (and could not) touch upon in his biography of the composer was their shared homosexuality.</ref> |
| <ref name="note3">[[Mendelssohn]] composed his Overture to ''A Midsummer Night's Dream'' in 1826, at the age of seventeen. The other incidental music for the play was written several years later.</ref>
| | <ref name="note3">Quoted in the notes to the memoirs of Nadezhda Kondratyeva in {{bib|1980/24|Воспоминания о П. И. Чайковском}} (1980), p. 378.</ref> |
| <ref name="note4">Adolph von Henselt (1814–1889), German composer, pianist, and piano teacher; worked in Russia for many years — ''note by Ernst Kuhn''.</ref>
| | <ref name="note4">See also the following entry in Tchaikovsky's diary for 23 June/5 July 1886 while at [[Maydanovo]]: "What a joy it is to see Legoshin here so often; he is such a wonderful person. Lord! and to think that there are people who will turn up their nose at the sight of a servant just because he is a servant. Why, I do not know anyone who has a purer and nobler soul than this Legoshin! And he is a servant! This sense of the equality of people in terms of their position in society has never struck me so decisively as in the given case". Quoted from {{bib|1993/231|Дневники П. И. Чайковского, 1873–1891}} (1993), p. 73.</ref> |
| <ref name="note5">Ferdinand Hiller (1811–1885), German pianist, conductor, and composer — ''note by Ernst Kuhn''.</ref>
| | <ref name="note5">See {{bib|1997/96|Жизнь Петра Ильича Чайковского ; том 3}} (1997), p. 13. See also Alexander Poznansky, ''{{bib|1993/186|Tchaikovsky: The Quest for the Inner Man}}'' (1993), p. 361-362, p. 477, and the same author's more recent Russian book, {{bib|2009/17|''Пётр Чайковский: Биография'' ; vol. 2}} (2009), p. 275-276, for more details on Tchaikovsky's attitude to Sasha Legoshin.</ref> |
| <ref name="note6">The ''Neue Zeitschrift für Musik'', founded in 1834 by [[Schumann]] and a number of his friends.</ref>
| |
| <ref name="note7">Woldemar Bargiel (1828–1897), German composer from the circle around [[Schumann]], [[Brahms]] and Josef Joachim — ''note by Ernst Kuhn''.</ref> | |
| <ref name="note8">Joachim Raff (1822–1882), Swiss composer, teacher and pianist.</ref>
| |
| <ref name="note9">Joseph Rheinberger (1839–1901), German composer and organist from Liechtenstein.</ref>
| |
| <ref name="note10">Robert Volkmann (1815–1883), German composer and teacher.</ref>
| |
| <ref name="note11">[[Ferdinand Laub]] (1832–1875), Czech violinist, conductor, and composer, taught at the [[Moscow]] Conservatory from 1866 to 1874 and was also chief conductor of the Russian Musical Society's symphony orchestra.</ref> | |
| <ref name="note12">Joachim Raff's String Quartet No. 4 in A minor, Op. 137, composed in the winter of 1866/67 — ''note by Ernst Kuhn''.</ref>
| |
| <ref name="note13">In 1869, [[Stasov]] published in the newspaper ''Saint Petersburg Register'' (Санкт-Петербургские ведомости) two articles against the musicologist and composer Aleksandr Famintsyn (1841–1896), entitled 'Musical Liars' and 'With regard to a letter from Mr Faminzyn'. [[Stasov]] was charged with libel, and although he was acquitted of this charge by the court, he was sentenced to 7 days' house arrest and a fine of 25 rubles for "scandal-mongering and improper language" — ''note by [[Vasily Yakovlev]]''.</ref>
| |
| <ref name="note14">"Rostislav" was the pseudonym used by the composer and music critic Feofil Tolstoy (1810–1881) — ''note by Ernst Kuhn''.</ref>
| |
| <ref name="note15">[[Johan Svendsen]] (1840–1911), Norwegian composer and violinist; he composed his Violin Concerto in A major, Op. 6, in 1870 — ''note by Ernst Kuhn''.</ref> | |
| <ref name="note16">Zinayda Eybozhenko, Russian contralto. See [[TH 263]] and [[TH 264]] for Tchaikovsky's observations on her performances as Vanya (in ''A Life for the Tsar)'' and Ratmir (in ''Ruslan and Lyudmila'').</ref>
| |
| <ref name="note17">Ivan Osipovich Shramek ({{=}} Josef Šramek; 1815–1874), Czech composer who settled in Russia in 1861 and worked as a conductor at the [[Moscow]] Bolshoi Theatre. After his death Tchaikovsky wrote an obituary on him (see [[TH 293]]) — ''note by Ernst Kuhn''.</ref>
| |
| </references> | | </references> |
| [[Category:Articles]] | | [[Category:People|Kondratyev, Nikolay]] |
| | [[Category:Dedicatees|Kondratyev, Nikolay]] |
| | [[Category:Friends|Kondratyev, Nikolay]] |
Nikolay Kondratyev (1832-1887)
Lawyer and friend of Tchaikovsky (b. 1832; d. 3 October 1887 at Aachen), born Nikolay Dmitriyevich Kondratyev (Николай Дмитриевич Кондратьев).
Tchaikovsky and Kondratyev
He was first introduced to Tchaikovsky in 1864 at the estate of Prince Aleksey Golitsyn in Trostinets, but became friendly with the composer in 1870, when Kondratyev brought his wife Mariya and daughter Nadezhda (b.1865) to Moscow for the winter. Tchaikovsky was also a frequent visitor to the family's estate at Nizy, near Kharkov, where he worked on his operas The Oprichnik (1870–72) and Vakula the Smith (1874), his Symphony No. 3 (1875), as well as his Guide to the Practical Study of Harmony (1871).
Modest Tchaikovsky, in his biography of the composer, noted how the latter's great friendship with Kondratyev might at first glance have seemed quite improbable, since Kondratyev was very much a man-about-town who moved in high society circles like a fish in water, whereas Tchaikovsky had distanced himself from that world ever since deciding to devote his life to music. However, Kondratyev's irrepressible cheerfulness and joie de vivre appealed to the composer enormously. Tchaikovsky's own optimism would gain fresh strength whenever he visited his friend, who was always happy and satisfied. Even in difficult moments he would invariably expect something to turn up, and in this respect the composer's brother Modest felicitously compared Kondratyev to Stiva Oblonsky in Tolstoy's Anna Karenina[1]. But as Alexander Poznansky has noted, Modest did not give a complete appraisal of Kondratyev's character: "From the [composer's] letters and diaries, however, emerges a different and far more complex relationship. In general, they draw a rather stormy picture of the relations between the two men, leaving little doubt that Kondratyev was a capricious, selfish, and wilful person and extremely difficult to get on with, especially for so sensitive and delicate a companion as Tchaikovsky. And yet, despite the categorical assertions quite often found in his writings, Tchaikovsky continued to take pleasure in Kondratyev's company" [2].
Kondratyev was in the habit of spending his money without thinking twice, and in the winter of 1881–82 he went with his wife and daughter to Italy, in order to accompany Tchaikovsky, Modest, and the latter's pupil Nikolay Konradi on their sight-seeing tours of Rome, Naples, Sorrento, Pompeii, and Florence. Although in the 1880s the Kondratyevs no longer spent their summers at Nizy, since they had moved to Saint Petersburg for the sake of Nadezhda's education, Tchaikovsky would still visit them frequently whenever he stopped by at the Imperial capital. In the summer of 1886, though, Kondratyev and his family rented a dacha at Maydanovo, near Tchaikovsky's house, greatly to the latter's delight. From Kondratyev's library he was able to borrow several volumes of Tolstoy's works that summer, leading to some fascinating diary entries about his favourite writer (see the entry on Lev Tolstoy for more details).
Tchaikovsky had always been very fond of Kondratyev's daughter Nadezhda (whom he had first met as a little girl and called "Dinochka" ever since), and in 1893 he would dedicate one of his last piano pieces to her: Valse-bluette (No. 11 of the Eighteen Pieces, Op. 72). Nadezhda wrote some remarkably vivid memoirs about the composer, describing his stays at their estate in Nizy during the 1870s. She also said the following about her father:
{{quote|My father, N. D. Kondratyev, famous for his friendship with Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, was a very clever and all-round educated person. He passionately loved music, literature, and painting; he read all the journals, spoke many languages, travelled a great deal, and read all the works written by Russian and foreign authors. He was bound by the very closest ties of friendship not only to Pyotr Ilyich, but also to Modest Ilyich [...] And as for my father, there was no dearer person and better friend on the whole wide world than Pyotr Ilyich" [3].
Early in 1887, however, Kondratyev became incurably ill with dropsy and underwent terrible agony during the last ten months of his life. Tchaikovsky stayed with him in Aachen for three of these months and tried to comfort and encourage his friend as best as he could, but in the end it was too much for him to bear and he left for Russia. After Kondratyev's death Tchaikovsky continued visiting his widow Mariya and daughter Nadezhda in Saint Petersburg. He also provided assistance to his late friend's servant Sasha Legoshin, whose character he thought very highly of [4]. He would often invite Legoshin's wife and children to stay with him at Maydanovo, Frolovskoye, and Klin during the summer months [5].
Tchaikovsky's Works Dedicated to Nikolay Kondratyev
Notes and References
- ↑ See Жизнь Петра Ильича Чайковского, том 1 (1997), p. 328–330.
- ↑ Alexander Poznansky, Tchaikovsky. The quest for the inner man (1993), p. 143. As also pointed out there, an important circumstance regarding Kondratyev which Modest did not (and could not) touch upon in his biography of the composer was their shared homosexuality.
- ↑ Quoted in the notes to the memoirs of Nadezhda Kondratyeva in Воспоминания о П. И. Чайковском (1980), p. 378.
- ↑ See also the following entry in Tchaikovsky's diary for 23 June/5 July 1886 while at Maydanovo: "What a joy it is to see Legoshin here so often; he is such a wonderful person. Lord! and to think that there are people who will turn up their nose at the sight of a servant just because he is a servant. Why, I do not know anyone who has a purer and nobler soul than this Legoshin! And he is a servant! This sense of the equality of people in terms of their position in society has never struck me so decisively as in the given case". Quoted from Дневники П. И. Чайковского (1873-1891) (1993), p. 73.
- ↑ See Жизнь Петра Ильича Чайковского, том 3 (1997), p. 13. See also Alexander Poznansky, Tchaikovsky. The quest for the inner man (1993), p. 361-362, p. 477, and the same author's more recent Russian book, Пётр Чайковский. Биография, том II (2009), p. 275-276, for more details on Tchaikovsky's attitude to Sasha Legoshin.
