Letter 4224 and Charles Gounod: Difference between pages

Tchaikovsky Research
(Difference between pages)
No edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{letterhead
{{picture|file=Charles Gounod.jpg|caption='''Charles Gounod''' (1818-1893)}}
|Date=28 September/10 October 1890
French composer (b. 17 June 1818 in [[Paris]]; d. 18 October 1893 in Saint-Cloud), born '''''Charles-François Gounod.
|To=[[Pyotr Jurgenson]]
|Place=[[Tiflis]]
|Language=Russian
|Autograph=[[Klin]] (Russia): {{RUS-KLč}} (a{{sup|3}}, No. 2718)
|Publication={{bib|1902/25|Жизнь Петра Ильича Чайковского ; том 3}} (1902), p. 402–403 (abridged)<br/>{{bib|1952/58|П. И. Чайковский. Переписка с П. И. Юргенсоном ; том 2}} (1952), p. 180–182<br/>{{bib|1977/40|П. И. Чайковский. Полное собрание сочинений ; том XV-Б}} (1977), p. 267–269
}}
==Text and Translation==
{{Lettertext
|Language=Russian
|Translator=Brett Langston
|Original text={{right|''Тифлис''<br/>28 сент[ября]}}
Возвращаясь к инциденту с присылкой мне приглашения на заседание дирекции, скажу тебе, что мой отказ от директорства был сделан задолго до общего собрания, состоявшегося в последний раз. Ты писал мне тогда, что ''Сафонов'' не решился объявить на этом общем собрании мой отказ, боясь толков в публике. Этот поступок есть новая наглость Сафонова, и все последующие приглашения на заседания (я их получал и в Флоренции, и в Риме, и в Фроловском, и в Тифлисе) я рассматривал как пренебрежение и невнимание ко мне. Окончательно взорван же я был теперь, ибо все то, что заставило меня выйти из дирекции, уже вошло в силу и действие. Впрочем, обижаюсь я, конечно, не на тебя, и не на Рукавишникова, и вообще не на дирекцию, а на ''Сафонова'', который делает все, что ему угодно. Меня нисколько не удивляет, что подписка на членские билеты идёт туго. Ещё в начале прошлого сезона я очень беспокоился о нынешнем и, если помнишь, всегда толковал, что этот сезон необходимо пожертвовать ''знаменитым'' солистам и, хотя бы с большими денежными затратами, привлечь в Москву все, что есть наиболее громкого и знаменитого по части виртуозности. С этой целью я поручил Цету (с разрешения дирекции) войти в сношение со всеми тузами музыкального мира. Следовало бы, как я и предполагал, при объявлении о концертах объявить и массу знаменитых имён. Конечно, дирижёрством г. Сафонова никого не привлечёшь. Почему мои предположения, одобренные дирекцией, не были приведены в исполнение? Сафонов хочет в нынешнем сезоне опять играть на ''Рубинштейне''? Но между Рубинштейном-пианистом и Рубинштейном-дирижёром большая разница. Да и лучше бы было Рубинштейна при беречь для будущего. Впрочем, дай Бог, чтобы комбинация с фондовым концертом удалась. Меня необыкновенно пугает и беспокоит, что в нынешнем году мы съедем на какие-нибудь пятьсот членов!!!! Ведь это будет чистое разорение! Хотя я и ушёл из дирекции и Сафонов все более и более делается мне противен, но оказывается, что интересы Моск[овского] муз[ыкального] общ[ества] я принимаю к сердцу так же близко, как прежде. У меня была (при всем нерас-положении к Саф[онову]) большая уверенность в его умелости и ловкости. Если он погубит этот сезон своей манией дирижёрства и вообще единовластия, то я возненавижу его в невероятной степени.


Ты сожалеешь, что я последовал губертовскому совету и не купил хлудовского имения 4 года тому назад. Но ты забыл, что я не ''мог'' его купить, ибо, кроме ежегодной уплаты, ''Хлудов'' требовал 10 тысяч первого взноса при покупке, а у меня этих 10 тысяч не было.
==Tchaikovsky and Gounod==
In the ''Foreword'' to his 1898 edition of Tchaikovsky's music review articles, [[Herman Laroche]] noted that, unlike most Russian theatre-goers, his late friend had not shared in the craze for Gounod's ''Faust'' when it was first staged in [[Saint Petersburg]] in 1864. Tchaikovsky had even quipped that the music of Césare Pugni's 1854 ballet ''Faust'' was much better than Gounod's opera. We can only speculate as to why this fresh and spirited work left Tchaikovsky cold at the time, but it is worth noting that ''Faust'' had not been an overwhelming success in [[Paris]] when it was premiered at the Théâtre-Lyrique in 1859, partly because audiences there were "disconcerted by the unusual harmonies, simple diction, and new forms of melodic phrasing" <ref name="note1"/>. Tchaikovsky may also have been put off by the liberties which the French librettists Barbier and Carré had taken with [[Goethe]]'s great drama, especially as [[Goethe]] was one of his favourite poets. (Not for nothing is the opera referred to as ''Margarethe'' in Germany, since Gounod's librettists had concentrated on the love story of ''Faust'' and Gretchen, her downfall and final redemption, leaving out so much else in [[Goethe]]'s play.) It is also worth bearing in mind that when Tchaikovsky first heard ''Faust'' in [[Saint Petersburg]] in 1864 it was performed in Italian, which may have made him suspicious of it as just another ''bel canto'' opera of the kind which flooded the repertoire in the Imperial theatres at the time.


Теперь сообщу тебе весьма ''для меня'' неприятную вещь. У меня отныне ''шестью тысячами'' в год будет меньше. На днях я получил от ''Н. Ф. фон Мекк'' письмо, в коем она сообщает, что, к крайнему своему прискорбию, вследствие запутанности дел и разорения почти полного принуждена прекратить выдачу ежегодной субсидии. Я перенёс этот удар философски, но тем не менее был неприятно поражён и удивлён. Она так много раз писала, что я обеспечен в отношении получения этой субсидии до последнего моего издыхания, что я в это уверовал и думал, что на сей предмет у неё устроена такая комбинация, что, несмотря ни на какие случайности, я не лишусь своего главного и, как я думал, самого верного дохода. Пришлось разочароваться. Теперь я должен совершенно иначе жить, по другому масштабу, и даже, вероятно, придётся искать какого-нибудь занятия в Петербурге, связанного с получением хорошего жалования. Очень, очень, очень ''обидно''; именно ''обидно''. Отношения мои к Н. Ф. фон М[екк] были такие, что я никогда н е тяготился её щедрой подачкой. Теперь я ретроспективно тягощусь; оскорблено моё самолюбие, обманута моя уверенность в её безграничную готовность материально поддерживать меня и приносить ради меня всяческие жертвы. Теперь мне бы хотелось, чтобы она окончательно разорилась, так, что. бы нуждалась в моей помощи. А то ведь я отлично знаю, что с ''нашей'' точки зрения она всё-таки страшно богата; словом, вышла какая-то банальная, глупая штука, от которой мне стыдно и тошно.
In the years immediately after its 1859 premiere, ''Faust'' was mounted at several European opera-houses, including [[Brussels]] (1861), Stockholm (1862), [[London]] and [[New York]] (1863), [[Saint Petersburg]] (1864), and [[Moscow]] (1866). This made a staging at the Grand-Opéra in [[Paris]] imperative, and when ''Faust'' was first performed there in 1869, with the Swedish soprano Christine Nilsson as Marguerite, it was a tremendous success. (For this definitive version Gounod added several numbers, including the ''Walpurgis Night'' ballet music in Act IV, as well as turning the spoken dialogues into recitatives with orchestral accompaniment.) Tchaikovsky would hear Christine Nilsson in this role on several occasions in [[Moscow]] between 1872 and 1874, but it was not she who first won him over to the beauty and dramatic intensity of Gounod's opera. As [[Laroche]] recalled, it was [[Désirée Artôt]]'s interpretation of Marguerite during her first tours to Russia (1868–70 and 1871–72) which radically changed Tchaikovsky's opinion of the opera.


Мне ужасно досадно, что не пришлось быть на Сашиной свадьбе. Это не фраза; я ужасно люблю твою дочку. Теперь Бог знает, когда я её увижу.
''Faust'' was so popular with Russian audiences and was staged so often by the Italian Opera Company in [[Moscow]] that in one music review article in 1874 Tchaikovsky even complained of this "force-feeding" of the public with Gounod's music ([[TH 297]]). However, this did not cause him to reject its merits. On the contrary, as we may see from the quarrel which ensued between Tchaikovsky and [[Vladimir Stasov]] when the latter spoke disparagingly of Gounod in 1877. The background to this quarrel was as follows: in February 1877, Tchaikovsky had lost interest in a projected opera ''[[Othello]]'', for which [[Stasov]] had provided him with a detailed scenario a few months earlier. He now asked [[Stasov]] to propose a new subject, and the latter suggested Alfred de Vigny's historical novel ''Cinq-Mars'' (1826), with ''The Cardinal'' as the title for the opera (de Vigny's novel deals with the intrigues of Cardinal Richelieu). However, Tchaikovsky rejected this subject outright, explaining that he wanted something more modest and intimate. He also added that it would be awkward to tackle the same subject as in Gounod's opera ''Cinq-Mars'' (1876), which had been premiered in [[Paris]] on 1 March 1877 {{NS}} and was soon also staged in [[Saint Petersburg]]: "Gounod is a master of the first rank, even if he is not a first-rate creative genius. In the field of opera I do not know of any other living composer — with the exception of [[Wagner]] — who could compete with Gounod" <ref name="note2"/>. [[Stasov]], not mincing his words as usual, wrote back saying that Gounod's music was banal, and this so infuriated Tchaikovsky that he ceased all collaboration with the mentor of the "Mighty Handful" for a while <ref name="note3"/>.


''Модест'' теперь, наверно, в Москве. Хотел бы ему написать, да не знаю, где он живёт. Пожалуйста, если он у тебя ещё не был, отыщи его (можно адрес узнать в Малом театре, где он присутствует на репетициях своей пиэсы) и сообщи ему содержание этого письма. Прибавь к этому, что Коля его совершенно здоров и очень доволен своим времяпровождением.
Tchaikovsky did not think so highly of Gounod's ''Roméo et Juliette'' (1867) — at least until he heard it in [[Paris]] again in 1883 (see the quotation from [[Letter 2253]] to [[Sergey Taneyev]] below) — and that is why he did not hesitate to attempt an opera based on the same subject himself in the summer of 1878. Although he eventually only sketched out one scene of this projected opera ''[[Romeo and Juliet]]'', he had been very enthusiastic about the idea and was not afraid of comparisons with Gounod's opera (or [[Bellini]]'s for that matter) because in his view the latter had "corrupted and distorted [[Shakespeare]] beyond recognition" <ref name="note4"/>.


Так как я приехал в Тифлис ещё богатым человеком, то за жил здесь на широкую ногу. Вследствие того мне ещё нужно денег; пожалуйста, немедленно вышли мне ''500 р[ублей]''.
On 18 February/1 March 1888, when he was in [[Paris]] as part of his first concert tour of Western Europe, Tchaikovsky met Gounod for the first time during a chamber music matinée concert at the house of the flutist [[Claude Paul Taffanel]] <ref name="note5"/>. Significantly, in May 1892, in order to help the co-operative opera company which the baritone [[Ippolit Pryanishnikov]] had recently set up in [[Kiev]] and which was on tour in [[Moscow]], Tchaikovsky agreed to conduct three operas for them without any remuneration. One of these operas was ''Faust'' — yet another sign of his appreciation of Gounod's masterpiece <ref name="note6"/>. In November 1892, Gounod was one of the French composers who supported Tchaikovsky's election as a corresponding member to the ''Académie des Beaux-Arts''.


Увидимся приблизительно через месяц. Я остановлюсь в Москве на один день и, кроме тебя, твоих. Баташи и Кашкина, никого не желаю видеть. Нужно будет нам собраться, и всего лучше у тебя.
It is interesting that [[Laroche]], in one of his tributes to the composer after his death, observed that Tchaikovsky in his works had traced "a middle path between Gounod and [[Schumann]]", combining the crowd-pleasing "outward brilliance" of the former with the "inner warmth" of the latter <ref name="note7"/>. However, [[Laroche]] was somewhat biased against Gounod's music, and Tchaikovsky certainly found more than just "outward brilliance" in ''Faust'', as is clear from his discussion of Christine Nilsson's first appearance as Marguerite in [[Moscow]] (references are listed below).


Я сочиняю симфоническую поэму. Пролей несколько слез.
==General Reflections on Gounod==
Bold references indicate particularly detailed or interesting references.


Ей-Богу, принёс бы большие жертвы ради того, чтобы Анна Васильевна, Функе и лёровская кухарка оказались правыми.
===In Tchaikovsky's Music Review Articles===
* [[TH 271]] — Tchaikovsky discusses Christine Nilsson's début in [[Moscow]] as Marguerite in ''Faust'' (30 November/12 December 1872), and although he concentrates mainly on her interpretation of the role, he does refer to ''Faust'' admiringly as "a magnificent opera".
* '''[[TH 309]]''' — praises the "elegance, softness, and feminine gracefulness" of Gounod's melodies in ''Roméo et Juliette'', but laments that most of them had been "stolen" from his earlier opera ''Faust''!


Обнимаю тебя.
===In Tchaikovsky's Letters===
{{right|П. Чайковский}}
* [[Letter 548]] to [[Vladimir Stasov]], 8/20 April 1877 (quoted above in main text).
* [[Letter 2253]] to [[Sergey Taneyev]] from [[Paris]], 1/13–3/15 April 1883, in which Tchaikovsky first talks about [[Mozart]]'s ''Le Nozze di Figaro'', which he had gone to see four times already at the ''Opéra-Comique'':
{{quote|Quite unexpectedly, I greatly enjoyed a performance of Gounod's ''Roméo et Juliette'', which I stumbled on by chance. I knew this work before, having studied the vocal-piano reduction, and also from a performance I saw in [[Moscow]] a long time ago, and I did not have a high opinion of it by any means, but there, suddenly — o wonder! I was moved to tears. I don't know: maybe it was [[Shakespeare]], who, in spite of all the librettists' cuts, still makes himself felt, or perhaps Gounod's music really is particularly good, or of course it may have been my mood at the time, thanks to which all these factors combined acquired a fortuitously magic effect. Anyway, what I wanted to say is that for a long time I had not enjoyed myself so much at the opera as on this occasion. It is also worth pointing out that Gounod is one of the few composers in our times who write not in compliance with preconceived theories, but as their feeling suggests to them. Besides, he is an inveterate admirer of [[Mozart]], and that demonstrates the integrity and innocence of his musical nature.}}


|Translated text={{right|''[[Tiflis]]''<br/>28 September}}
==Views on Specific Works by Gounod==
Returing to the incident of my receiving an invitation to a directors' meeting, I remind you that my resignation as a director was made long before the last general meeting, which took place on the previous occasion. You wrote to me then that ''[[Safonov]]'' did not dare to announce my resignation at this general meeting, for fear of the public response. This was a fresh act of impudence from [[Safonov]], and I have regarded all subsequent invitations to meetings (I received them in [[Florence]], and in [[Rome]], and at [[Frolovskoye]], and in [[Tiflis]]) as contemptible and insulting to. I'm now decidedly exasperated, because everything that compelled me to leave the directorate has already come to pass. However, my resentment is not, of course, directed at you, nor at [[Rukavishnikov]], nor to the directorate in general, but at [[Safonov]], who does whatever he pleases. I'm not in the least surprised that membership subscriptions are slack. Even at the start of last season, I was very worried about the current one, and, if you remember, I always argued that this season should be sacrificed to ''famous'' soloists, and despite the large financial expenditure, everything should be done to attract the biggest and most famous virtuosos to [[Moscow]]. To this end, I instructed Zet (with the directorate's permission) to enter into negotiations with all the bigwigs in the musical world. There ought to have been, as I expected, a mass of famous names to announce on the concert bills. Of course, no-one wants to come when Mr [[Safonov]] is the conductor. Why were my suggestions, approved by the directorate, not carried out? [[Safonov]] wants ''[[Anton Rubinstein|Rubinstein]]'' to play again this season? But there is a big difference between [[Anton Rubinstein|Rubinstein]] the pianist and [[Anton Rubinstein|Rubinstein]] the conductor. And it would be better to keep [[Anton Rubinstein|Rubinstein]] for the future. Anyway, God grant that the combination with the charity concert will be a success. I'm exceedingly alarmed and worried that this year we'll fall to some five hundred members!!!! Surely this would be simply devastating! Even though I've left the directorate and [[Safonov]] is becoming more and more objectionable to me, it turns out that I still take the interests of the Moscow Musical Society as closely to my heart as before. For all my lack of rapport with [[Safonov]], I did have a great deal of confidence in his skill and deftness. If he ruins this season through his obsession with conducting and autocracy in general, then my loathing for him will know no bounds.  
Bold references indicate particularly detailed or interesting references.


You regret that I followed [[Hubert]]'s advice and didn't buy Khludov's estate 4 years ago. But you forget that I ''could'' not buy it, because besides the annual payment, ''Khludov'' demanded 10 thousand of the first instalment at the point of purchase, which was 10 thousand that I didn't have.
===In Tchaikovsky's Music Review Articles===
* ''Faust'' , opera (1859) — [[TH 271]], [[TH 309]]
* ''Roméo et Juliette'', opera (1867) — '''[[TH 309]]'''; letter 2253 to [[Sergey Taneyev]] from [[Paris]], 1/13–3/15 April 1883 (quoted above)


Now I shall tell you about something very unpleasant, ''for me''. Henceforth, I will be worse off by ''six thousand'' a year. The other day I received a letter from ''[[Nadezhda von Meck|N. F. von Meck]]'' in which she told me that, to her profound regret, due to confusion in her business affairs, and almost utter ruin, she is obliged to terminate the issuance of her annual subsidy. I bore this blow philosophically, but nevertheless I was unpleasantly surprised and astonished. She wrote so many times regarding this subsidy that I was guaranteed to receive it until my last breath, that I believed this, and I thought that in this respect she had arranged matters such that, any accidents notwithstanding, I would never lose my principal and, as I thought, most reliable income. I have reason to be disappointed. Now I must live completely differently, on a different scale, and I'll probably even have to look for some sort of employment in [[Petersburg]], with the aim of obtaining a good salary. I am very, very, very ''offended''; indeed ''insulted''. My relationship with ''[[Nadezhda von Meck|N. F. von Meck]]'' was such that I was never burdened by her generous hand out. Now I'm burdened in retrospect; my pride was injured, and my faith in her boundless readiness to support me materially and to make all manner of sacrifices for me was misplaced. Now I would like to see her utterly ruined, so that she would need my help. But really I know very well that ''our'' point of view she is still terribly rich; in a short, it's a banal and stupid thing, which shames and sickens me.
==Bibliography==
* {{bib|1974/38}} (1974)
* {{bib|1993/3}} (1993)


I'm terribly annoyed that I couldn't be at [[Aleksandra Snegireva-Jurgenson|Sasha]]'s wedding. These are not just words; I love your daughter terribly. Now God knows when I'll see her.
==External Links==
* [[wikipedia:Charles Gounod|Wikipedia]]
* {{IMSLP|Gounod,_Charles}}


[[Modest]] must surely be in [[Moscow]] now. I should like to write to him, but I don't know where he's staying. If you haven't already done so, please find him (you can learn his address from the Maly Theatre, where he's attending the rehearsals of his plays) and inform him of the contents of this letter. Add to this that [[Nikolay Konradi|Kolya]] is completely well, and passing the time very contentedly.
==References==
 
<references>
Since I came to [[Tiflis]] still a rich man, I've lived here on a grand scale. Consequently, I am still in need of money;; please, send me ''500 rubles'' immediately.
<ref name="note1">See {{bib|1898/24|Музыкальные фельетоны и заметки Петра Ильича Чайковского (1868-1876)}} (1898).</ref>
 
<ref name="note2">John Humbley, "Faust in Paris", notes for a Marston Records disc, available [http://www.marstonrecords.com/faust/faust_liner.htm online].</ref>
I'll be seeing you in around a month. I'll be staying in [[Moscow]] for one day and, apart from you, yours, [[Batasha]] and [[Kashkin]], I don't want to see anyone. We must get together, preferably at yours.
<ref name="note3">[[Letter 548]] to [[Vladimir Stasov]], 8/20 April 1877. This quarrel is discussed by Marek Bobéth in {{bib|1995/13|Čajkovskij und das Mächtige Häuflein}} (1995), p. 80–81, who also points out that after [[Bizet]] (who had died in 1875), Gounod was the French composer whom Tchaikovsky rated most highly. Tchaikovsky's rejection of grand historical subjects in favour of something "more modest and intimate" would lead him to take up enthusiastically [[Yelizaveta Lavrovskaya]]'s suggestion of ''[[Yevgeny Onegin]]'' later that year (in May 1877).</ref>
 
<ref name="note4">[[Letter 840]] to [[Nadezhda von Meck]], 23 May/4 June 1878.</ref>
I'm composing a symphonic poem. I shed a few tears.  
<ref name="note5">See {{bib|1993/231|Дневники П. И. Чайковского: 1873-1891}} (1993), p. 202.</ref>
 
<ref name="note6">See [[Ippolit Pryanishnikov]]'s reminiscences in {{bib|1980/24|Воспоминания о П. И. Чайковском}} (1980), p. 254-257; English translation by David Brown in {{bib|1993/33|Tchaikovsky Remembered}} (1993), p. 128–129. The other two operas were [[Anton Rubinstein]]'s ''The Demon'' and his own ''[[Yevgeny Onegin]]''.</ref>
My God, what I wouldn't have given for Anna Vasilyevna, Funke and Ler's cook to have turned out to be right.
<ref name="note7">[[Laroche]]'s obituary is quoted here from {{bib|1993/33|Tchaikovsky Remembered}} (1993), p. 239.</ref>
 
</references>
I embrace you.
[[Category:People|Gounod, Charles]]
{{right|P. Tchaikovsky}}
[[Category:Composers|Gounod, Charles]]
}}

Revision as of 13:12, 14 November 2022

Charles Gounod (1818-1893)

French composer (b. 17 June 1818 in Paris; d. 18 October 1893 in Saint-Cloud), born Charles-François Gounod.

Tchaikovsky and Gounod

In the Foreword to his 1898 edition of Tchaikovsky's music review articles, Herman Laroche noted that, unlike most Russian theatre-goers, his late friend had not shared in the craze for Gounod's Faust when it was first staged in Saint Petersburg in 1864. Tchaikovsky had even quipped that the music of Césare Pugni's 1854 ballet Faust was much better than Gounod's opera. We can only speculate as to why this fresh and spirited work left Tchaikovsky cold at the time, but it is worth noting that Faust had not been an overwhelming success in Paris when it was premiered at the Théâtre-Lyrique in 1859, partly because audiences there were "disconcerted by the unusual harmonies, simple diction, and new forms of melodic phrasing" [1]. Tchaikovsky may also have been put off by the liberties which the French librettists Barbier and Carré had taken with Goethe's great drama, especially as Goethe was one of his favourite poets. (Not for nothing is the opera referred to as Margarethe in Germany, since Gounod's librettists had concentrated on the love story of Faust and Gretchen, her downfall and final redemption, leaving out so much else in Goethe's play.) It is also worth bearing in mind that when Tchaikovsky first heard Faust in Saint Petersburg in 1864 it was performed in Italian, which may have made him suspicious of it as just another bel canto opera of the kind which flooded the repertoire in the Imperial theatres at the time.

In the years immediately after its 1859 premiere, Faust was mounted at several European opera-houses, including Brussels (1861), Stockholm (1862), London and New York (1863), Saint Petersburg (1864), and Moscow (1866). This made a staging at the Grand-Opéra in Paris imperative, and when Faust was first performed there in 1869, with the Swedish soprano Christine Nilsson as Marguerite, it was a tremendous success. (For this definitive version Gounod added several numbers, including the Walpurgis Night ballet music in Act IV, as well as turning the spoken dialogues into recitatives with orchestral accompaniment.) Tchaikovsky would hear Christine Nilsson in this role on several occasions in Moscow between 1872 and 1874, but it was not she who first won him over to the beauty and dramatic intensity of Gounod's opera. As Laroche recalled, it was Désirée Artôt's interpretation of Marguerite during her first tours to Russia (1868–70 and 1871–72) which radically changed Tchaikovsky's opinion of the opera.

Faust was so popular with Russian audiences and was staged so often by the Italian Opera Company in Moscow that in one music review article in 1874 Tchaikovsky even complained of this "force-feeding" of the public with Gounod's music (TH 297). However, this did not cause him to reject its merits. On the contrary, as we may see from the quarrel which ensued between Tchaikovsky and Vladimir Stasov when the latter spoke disparagingly of Gounod in 1877. The background to this quarrel was as follows: in February 1877, Tchaikovsky had lost interest in a projected opera Othello, for which Stasov had provided him with a detailed scenario a few months earlier. He now asked Stasov to propose a new subject, and the latter suggested Alfred de Vigny's historical novel Cinq-Mars (1826), with The Cardinal as the title for the opera (de Vigny's novel deals with the intrigues of Cardinal Richelieu). However, Tchaikovsky rejected this subject outright, explaining that he wanted something more modest and intimate. He also added that it would be awkward to tackle the same subject as in Gounod's opera Cinq-Mars (1876), which had been premiered in Paris on 1 March 1877 [N.S.] and was soon also staged in Saint Petersburg: "Gounod is a master of the first rank, even if he is not a first-rate creative genius. In the field of opera I do not know of any other living composer — with the exception of Wagner — who could compete with Gounod" [2]. Stasov, not mincing his words as usual, wrote back saying that Gounod's music was banal, and this so infuriated Tchaikovsky that he ceased all collaboration with the mentor of the "Mighty Handful" for a while [3].

Tchaikovsky did not think so highly of Gounod's Roméo et Juliette (1867) — at least until he heard it in Paris again in 1883 (see the quotation from Letter 2253 to Sergey Taneyev below) — and that is why he did not hesitate to attempt an opera based on the same subject himself in the summer of 1878. Although he eventually only sketched out one scene of this projected opera Romeo and Juliet, he had been very enthusiastic about the idea and was not afraid of comparisons with Gounod's opera (or Bellini's for that matter) because in his view the latter had "corrupted and distorted Shakespeare beyond recognition" [4].

On 18 February/1 March 1888, when he was in Paris as part of his first concert tour of Western Europe, Tchaikovsky met Gounod for the first time during a chamber music matinée concert at the house of the flutist Claude Paul Taffanel [5]. Significantly, in May 1892, in order to help the co-operative opera company which the baritone Ippolit Pryanishnikov had recently set up in Kiev and which was on tour in Moscow, Tchaikovsky agreed to conduct three operas for them without any remuneration. One of these operas was Faust — yet another sign of his appreciation of Gounod's masterpiece [6]. In November 1892, Gounod was one of the French composers who supported Tchaikovsky's election as a corresponding member to the Académie des Beaux-Arts.

It is interesting that Laroche, in one of his tributes to the composer after his death, observed that Tchaikovsky in his works had traced "a middle path between Gounod and Schumann", combining the crowd-pleasing "outward brilliance" of the former with the "inner warmth" of the latter [7]. However, Laroche was somewhat biased against Gounod's music, and Tchaikovsky certainly found more than just "outward brilliance" in Faust, as is clear from his discussion of Christine Nilsson's first appearance as Marguerite in Moscow (references are listed below).

General Reflections on Gounod

Bold references indicate particularly detailed or interesting references.

In Tchaikovsky's Music Review Articles

  • TH 271 — Tchaikovsky discusses Christine Nilsson's début in Moscow as Marguerite in Faust (30 November/12 December 1872), and although he concentrates mainly on her interpretation of the role, he does refer to Faust admiringly as "a magnificent opera".
  • TH 309 — praises the "elegance, softness, and feminine gracefulness" of Gounod's melodies in Roméo et Juliette, but laments that most of them had been "stolen" from his earlier opera Faust!

In Tchaikovsky's Letters

Quite unexpectedly, I greatly enjoyed a performance of Gounod's Roméo et Juliette, which I stumbled on by chance. I knew this work before, having studied the vocal-piano reduction, and also from a performance I saw in Moscow a long time ago, and I did not have a high opinion of it by any means, but there, suddenly — o wonder! I was moved to tears. I don't know: maybe it was Shakespeare, who, in spite of all the librettists' cuts, still makes himself felt, or perhaps Gounod's music really is particularly good, or of course it may have been my mood at the time, thanks to which all these factors combined acquired a fortuitously magic effect. Anyway, what I wanted to say is that for a long time I had not enjoyed myself so much at the opera as on this occasion. It is also worth pointing out that Gounod is one of the few composers in our times who write not in compliance with preconceived theories, but as their feeling suggests to them. Besides, he is an inveterate admirer of Mozart, and that demonstrates the integrity and innocence of his musical nature.

Views on Specific Works by Gounod

Bold references indicate particularly detailed or interesting references.

In Tchaikovsky's Music Review Articles

Bibliography

External Links

References

  1. See Музыкальные фельетоны и заметки Петра Ильича Чайковского, 1868-1876 (1898).
  2. John Humbley, "Faust in Paris", notes for a Marston Records disc, available online.
  3. Letter 548 to Vladimir Stasov, 8/20 April 1877. This quarrel is discussed by Marek Bobéth in Čajkovskij und das Mächtige Häuflein (1995), p. 80–81, who also points out that after Bizet (who had died in 1875), Gounod was the French composer whom Tchaikovsky rated most highly. Tchaikovsky's rejection of grand historical subjects in favour of something "more modest and intimate" would lead him to take up enthusiastically Yelizaveta Lavrovskaya's suggestion of Yevgeny Onegin later that year (in May 1877).
  4. Letter 840 to Nadezhda von Meck, 23 May/4 June 1878.
  5. See Дневники П. И. Чайковского (1873-1891) (1993), p. 202.
  6. See Ippolit Pryanishnikov's reminiscences in Воспоминания о П. И. Чайковском (1980), p. 254-257; English translation by David Brown in Tchaikovsky remembered (1993), p. 128–129. The other two operas were Anton Rubinstein's The Demon and his own Yevgeny Onegin.
  7. Laroche's obituary is quoted here from Tchaikovsky remembered (1993), p. 239.